Over the past few weeks, I've slowly trawled my way through the readings. I don't want to comment on them individually because each reading focuses on a specific aspect of leadership.
There are two points that have been bolted into my head after reading. As the unit progresses and I complete the assignments, it will become a little more better.
1. Being Proactive - If you ever want to get your way in life, you must act proactively. That means initating the opportunity to take action on what you want to achieve. You cannot let others do the change for you. There is no way you can establish yourself as a leader.
As a teacher-librarian, it means that I must identify the issues and not be scared to speak to relevant staff or the principal. It may mean taking risks but more often than not there is nothing to lose.
If you can get the ball rolling, others will come behind and back you.
I sat on the Strathfield Campus Student Association (SCSA) a student union at the Strathfield Campus of the Australian Catholic University between 2005 and 2009. I look back and realise that initatives such as a shuttle bus service to Strathfield Station would have not resulted if it was not for me raising the issue in the first place but also taking the time to provide a case as to why it should be offered. I even approached local politicans who ignored us, but it mean't that people were aware of the issue. The university eventually supported the idea and students now have this option when they travel to and from class. I raised the issue at a meeting in 2007, but we had to wait until 2010 before the shuttle bus commenced service.
2. The art of negotiation - It's give and take but also listening to differing views to provide an agreement that will benefit all parties by "meeting halfway". I thought it was interesting to note that it is up to all parties to enter the room and come to agreement.
In my professional role - It is part and parcel of the job. Budgets are limited, resources and facilities are limited and obviously unlimited wants and needs. It is part of anyone's normal life. There are limited resources. We have to make use of what is there to it's best. I have to weigh the wants and needs against the limited resources. Some times it may involve sacrifice but if done rightly will result in maximum gain.
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Module 2 - ETL503
For module two of ETL503 - I am going to comment on a recent decision by the UNSW library to reduce it's selection of print resources.
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/books-get-the-shove-as-university-students-prefer-to-do-research-online-20110307-1bl8b.html
The argument by the university is simple - the resources are available online and the students prefer getting their material for research online.
However Librarians don't agree with it as they see books and resources of educational value thrown away. In fact they raid the skip bins to save them and the shelves are replaced with tables for students to work on their assignments and socialise.
Even documents of historical nature are thrown away. Once they are gone, they are gone forever even if they are digitised. It brings a sense of authenticenty.
Personally I was astounded by this news. A good researcher is one that uses a wide variety of resources in their study. Print resources have value. While the practical or real world information might be irrelevant, the theory or historical content is still relevant. It will give one the background to understand a concept. I found using old texts provide me the background that I needed to understand and learn. Using that information, I could turn to recent findings to assist using online journals and databases to help. In schools, research projects require that one demonstrate a wide variety of sources. That doesn't just include online resources, but print resources as well. They both go hand in hand with each other.
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/books-get-the-shove-as-university-students-prefer-to-do-research-online-20110307-1bl8b.html
The argument by the university is simple - the resources are available online and the students prefer getting their material for research online.
However Librarians don't agree with it as they see books and resources of educational value thrown away. In fact they raid the skip bins to save them and the shelves are replaced with tables for students to work on their assignments and socialise.
Even documents of historical nature are thrown away. Once they are gone, they are gone forever even if they are digitised. It brings a sense of authenticenty.
Personally I was astounded by this news. A good researcher is one that uses a wide variety of resources in their study. Print resources have value. While the practical or real world information might be irrelevant, the theory or historical content is still relevant. It will give one the background to understand a concept. I found using old texts provide me the background that I needed to understand and learn. Using that information, I could turn to recent findings to assist using online journals and databases to help. In schools, research projects require that one demonstrate a wide variety of sources. That doesn't just include online resources, but print resources as well. They both go hand in hand with each other.
